We continue our attempt to provide a wide variety of perspectives on what is happening in the Ukraine. Here we present the perspective of some of the Jewish establishment organizations reassuring us that anti-Semitism is not a big problem in the new post-coup reality of Ukraine, and then an article from a very different perspective by Zoltan Grossman arguing that the new Ukrainian government includes overtly fascist forces and that it is moving quickly to “privatize” essential services and utilities that are being given to the rich who will sell these back to the Ukrainian people who previously received them without regard to private profit.
Editorials & Actions
Transformative Medicine as one Part of Emancipatory Spirituality
|
One of the foci of the interfaith and atheist or secular humanist welcoming Network of Spiritual Progressives (you DO NOT have to be religious or believe in God to be a spiritual progressive) is to build consciousness changing groups in every profession. The goal: to help professionals envision what their profession could look like if the “bottom line” in their profession was not making more money and accumulating more power, but was instead at least equally seeking to maximize through the practice of their profession the fostering of human beings who gave priority to building a world based on love and caring, kindness and generosity, ethical behavior and ecological sensitivity, and awe and wonder and radical amazement at the grandeur and mystery of the universe. What might that look like? I developed some initial ideas on this in my book in 2000 called Spirit Matters. Below, I reprint my chapter on a Transformative Medicine to give you an idea of what kind of visioning we have in mind.
Editorials & Actions
Jews Against Zionism–an intro to their perspective
|
Editor’s note: While the article below has a narrow conception of Zionism, equating it with the policies of its most racist and reactionary elements (though not without some foundation, given that these elements are currently dominant in the Zionist movement)–a mistake similar to that made by some in the Left when they identify American patriotism solely with the right-wingers who wrap themselves in the American flag to defend imperialist policies and not with the liberal and progressive movements that have flourished and often triumphed in American history– it is nevertheless important for Tikkunistas (those who mobilize to heal and transform the world, hopefully by joining our Network of Spiritual Progressives) to inform ourselves about the views of people who totally reject Zionism in all its iterations, even if we do not fully agree with them. Check out the article here on Stephen Lendman’s blog. –Rabbi Michael Lerner. Jews Against Zionism
by Stephen Lendman
They’re numerous, outspoken, and range from secular to orthodox to one group calling itself “True Torah Jews Against Zionism.” They believe that “traditional” Jews don’t support Zionism, an ideology they call “contrary to Jewish law and beliefs and the teachings of the Holy Torah.”
Editorials & Actions
Peter Beinert on why Israel Has Lost the Moral High Ground
|
Reprinted from Ha’aretz, Israel’s premier newspaper. View article here. AIPAC speech pits Netanyahu vs. Herzl on the nature of moral divides
by Peter Beinart
Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech this week to AIPAC was like Havdalah. It was about separation.
Editorials & Actions
The verbal assaults on Kerry from Israel
|
This article from Israel’s premier newspaper, Ha’aretz, reminds us that it’s not just the little guys who get verbal abuse when disagreeing with whatever is the official line of Israel on just about any question. Israeli officials and their cheerleaders in the U.S. feel free to throw the term “anti-Semite” at anyone who disagrees with anything they are doing or proposing. The tragedy in this is that in the course of several decades of this loosey-goosey use of the charge of anti-Semitism, they’ve lessened the sting of the accusation itself, so that more and more decent people, including many young Jews, shrug their shoulders when called anti-semitic, as the term itself has increasingly come to mean “willing to criticize the policies of the State of Israel.” View the full article here. — Rabbi Michael Lerner
Rice tweets: Israel, we’re mad as hell and not going to take it anymore
Stream of insults hurled at Kerry reflects peace process jitters, but also five years of bad chemistry between Netanyahu and Obama.
Editorials & Actions
A Variety of Perspectives on the Ukraine Conflict and the Potential Revival of a Cold War
|
Some of our readers have objected to us presenting critiques of the coup that overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected government, which had tilted away from the European Union and toward Russia. We were not seeking to affirm that choice in particular—rather, we were seeking to present a more complex picture of the situation by pointing to the one-sidedness in the media, which made it seem as if the West were obviously innocently interested in promoting human rights and democracy and therefore siding with the coup from the streets.
Editorials & Actions
Challenging the Power of the Banks
|
The Stone That Brings Down Goliath? Richmond and Eminent Domain
Tuesday, 04 March 2014 10:09By Ellen Brown,
Mayor Gayle McLaughlin of Richmond, California, in front of a boarded-up house in Richmond, December 20, 2013. Many Richmond residents owe more money on their houses than their houses are worth, but McLaughlin’s plan to use of eminent domain to prevent foreclosures has faced significant opposition. (Photo: Jim Wilson / The New York Times)
In a nearly $13 billion settlement with the US Justice Department in November 2013, JPMorganChase admitted that it, along with every other large US bank, had engaged in mortgage fraud as a routine business practice, sowing the seeds of the mortgage meltdown. JPMorgan and other megabanks have now been caught in over a dozen major frauds, including LIBOR-rigging and bid-rigging; yet no prominent banker has gone to jail.
Editorials & Actions
Ukraine: What is Really Happening
|
Editor’s Note from Rabbi Michael Lerner:
One thing I’m sure of is that media accounts available in the United States are so tainted by anti-Russia and U.S. nationalist and capitalist interests that we have no idea of what is really happening in Ukraine. It is clear that the U.S. involvement is not “out of the blue,” but part of an ongoing campaign to increase NATO power and Western economic penetration of the countries surrounding Russia, stimulating for some Russians reminders of the previous trauma of being attacked by the Nazis and others through the Ukraine, where pro-fascist, anti-communist and anti-Semitic sentiments ran strong and welcomed foreign interventions. While we at Tikkun have some doubts about parts of the analyses by Robert Parry and Norman Solomon presented below, I am sharing them because they have the advantage of momentarily challenging the dominant discourse, though in ways that represent its own peculiar perspective. And they do have some plausibility—we know that much of the neo-con perspective on the world is based on an amalgam to two somewhat different commitments that have been welded together:
the neo-cons whose primary goal is to maintain and expand the U.S. economic and political empire and
the neo-cons whose primary goal is to protect Israel and destroy all of its potential enemies–a list that grows longer and longer as long as Israel retains its dominance over the Palestinian people and denies them fundamental human rights. These two goals come together as long as the United States is perceived by the neo-cons as the primary and sole reliable ally of Israel, and all others are suspected of being willing to see Israel destroyed.
Editorials & Actions
Uri Avnery on Germany Trying to Deal with its Nazi Past?
|
[Editor’s Note: Avnery doesn’t deal with another important aspect of Germans’ continuing feelings of guilt for what their Nazi past did to the world and to the Jewish people: the way that that guilt keeps Germany from actually doing what would be in the Jewish people’s best interest, namely putting economic and political pressure to end the Occupation and reconcile with the Palestinian people. Similarly, the guilt Christians feel for 2000 years of indoctrinating the world with hatred of Jews is now dealt with by refusing to do the one thing that would be of greatest service to the Jewish people: namely, pushing Israel toward reconciliation with the Palestinian people. So this is how guilt actually works against the goodness of people in the Christian Church and in the new generations of Germans–by condemning them to policies that are substantively bad for the Jewish people by being collaborators with Israel’s oppressive policies toward Palestinians. Yet the guilt feelings are legitimate in both cases, only they play out in ways that are bad for the Jews, because it is bad for the Jews to be identified with policies of a nation state that claims to be “THE Jewish State” while acting against Jewish values in its treatment of “the other.” Oy.
Editorials & Actions
Avrum Burg on BDS
|
Avrum Burg was chair of the Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization, a member of Knesset, chair of the Knesset, and for a brief moment even served as interim Prime Minister of the State of Israel. Here are his reflections on the movement for Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel till it ends the Occupation of the West Bank, reprinted from Ha’aretz, Israel’s most respected newspaper.
What’s Wrong with BDS by Avrum Burg
Talk of sanctions has been filling the air lately. Israelis, as always, are certain that the whole world is against us (psycho-national nonsense that will be more broadly discussed here in the future), and that all the world’s overt and covert conspiracies are focused solely on us – out of hatred and anti-Semitism, of course. Few notice the wonderful paradox whereby official Israel, together with mobilized world Jewry, fights the scourge of sanctions by whining and screaming anti-Semitism, Holocaust and Jew-hatred in chorus.
Culture
Pete Seeger: A Personal Remembrance
|
I could scarcely believe my ears when staff members at Tikkun told me that Pete Seeger had just called to ask if he could perform at the first national Tikkun conference in New York City in 1988. I had raised my son on Seeger’s music, and had myself been moved by some of his radical songs. He was already a legend, and I was already a fan when I was in high school.
Editorials & Actions
Uri Avnery on Netanyahu’s Demand that Palestinians Recognize Israel not Just as a State, but as a Jewish State
|
Uri Avnery
January 11, 2014
Bibi & Libie
PERHAPS I am too stupid, but for the heck of me I cannot understand the sense of the Israeli demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state. On the face of it, it seems like a clever trick by Binyamin Netanyahu to divert attention from the real issues. If so, the Palestinian leadership has fallen into a trap. Instead of talking about the independence of the putative State of Palestine and its borders, its capital in Jerusalem, the removal of the settlements, the fate of the refugees and the solution of the many other problems, they quarrel endlessly about the definition of Israel. One is tempted to call out to the Palestinians: what the hell, accord them this damn recognition and be done with it!
Editorials & Actions
Boycotting Israeli Universities–The Right Way to Fight the Israeli Occupation?
|
The Israel Boycott Movement and Controversy – Differing Views
Omar Barghouti; Linda Gordon; Robin D.G. Kelley; Sydney Lev
January 4, 2014
Debate over Israeli policy on settlements in the occupied lands, the on-going discrimination against Palestinians and Jews of color within Israel, negotiations with the Palestinian state, and peace with Iran are now hot items on campuses, academic organizations, and within the Jewish community. While there are disagreements on the tactics of BDS, this debate and discussion should be welcomed. Here Portside presents four different views of the BDS campaign. Boycotts – A Tipping Point? – Omar Barghouti (Inside Higher Ed)
Don’t Cut Off Debate With Israeli Institutions -Enrich It Instead – Linda Gordon, Alice Kessler-Harris, and Elaine Tyler May (The Chronicle of Higher Education – The Conversation)
Jewish Voice for Peace Responds to ASA’s Vote on Academic Boycotts – Sydney Levy (Jewish Voice for Peace)
Defending Zionism Under the Cloak of Academic Freedom – Robin D. G. Kelley (Mondoweiss)
Boycotts – A Tipping Point?
Editorials & Actions
A Jewish State Would Not Be Oppressive or Racist Toward the Powerless, the Immigrants, the Homeless, The Other–an essay by Uri Avnery
|
Editor’s Note: Uri Avnery, a committed atheist and chair of Israel’s peace movement Gush Shalom, recognizes that the real problem in Israel today is not that it is a Jewish state, but that it is not Jewish at all in the values it embodies in many respects. I have argued in my book Jewish Renewal:A Path to Healing and Transformation a similar thesis–with one qualification: there are two competing Judaisms, from the Torah onward, one a Judaism of love (“You shall love the stranger–remember that you were strangers in the land of Egypt”), a Judaism of generosity (share what you have with the poor, and don’t take advantage of those in need–so do not take interest on any loan you give to others), a Judaism of justice (justice, justice shall thou pursue), a Judaism of environmental sanity (stop all work on transforming the earth every Sabbath and also every seventh year the entire year, everyone the same year, be stewards of the earth recognize that you don’t “own” the earth but are merely wayfarers here for a short period of time but while you are here share the earth and its bounties with those in need) and the other what I call “settler Judaism” committed to conquest and “power over.” These two Judaisms are the different ways that people have heard God’s voice for thousands of years, and these two voices are in the secular and non-Jewish consciousness of every other people on the planet as well (e.g. the difference between Martin Luther King, Jr and Barack Obama, or between Jimmy Carter and Hillary Clinton, or between Rabbis for Human Rights in Israel/Btselem/Truah/Tikkun/Network of Spiritual Progressives/New Israel Fund on the one hand and the American Jewish Committee/Anti-Defamation League/Moment Magazine/Commentary Magazine/national Hillel Foundations/and much of the Orthodox and Conservative movements in the U.S. on the other hand while Reform, Reconstructionist and Jewish Renewal movements have both voices struggling inside them but neither voice has absolute priority at least not yet). And did you read the full page ad bought by Shmuli Boteyach in the New York Times and featuring a message from Elie Wiesel, the voice of those stuck in Holocaust consciousness, urging the US to not seek peace with Iran but instead escalate sanctions at the very moment when the Obama Administration, in one of its few courageous moments, is seeking to find a peaceful path to prevent Iran from developing a military nuclear capacity–only surprising to those who haven’t followed Wiesel’s path toward greater and greater nationalist chauvinism and refusal to speak out on behalf of the Palestinian people or to critique any aspect of Israeli policy toward non-Jews.
I have always argued that both voices are in all of us, a voice of fear versus a voice of hope, a voice that tells us to assume that the other wants to hurt us versus a voice that tells us that the other may also be scared and that if we approach them with generosity of spirit that over some amount of time their fear can be assuaged (or another way of saying it: No, not everyone whom we are in conflict with is a Hitler or a Nazi, though we have compassion for those whose trauma from those kind of terrible experiences makes it hard for them to see the world through any other framework by that of the Holocaust or of 9/11 or of the Nakba or…well every people on the planet has its experience of hurt and hate that it can use to justify going into that fearful place). So my prayer is that we can acknowledge when any group of people are in that fearful place, have compassion for them, and try to wean them away from that consciousness, but also forthrightly challenge the resulting militarism, racism, and oppressive policies that dirty their souls and make other people who witness these behaviors despair of justice and peace, or even give up on the possibility of a world of love and generosity!
Editorials & Actions
Congressman Keith Ellison Introduced to Congress a resolution in Support of the Tikkun/NSP version of the Global Marshall Plan
|
Great news! Congressman Keith Ellison, who represents Minneapolis/St Paul in the U.S. House of Representatives, introduced a resolution in effect endorsing the NSP version of a Global Marshall Plan into the House of Representatives as H Res 439. It was referred to the Republican controlled Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives. Please read the resolution below and send thanks to his legislative aide Vic Edgerton: vic.edgerton@mail.house.gov or by calling Congressman Keith Ellison’s office in Minnesota at
612-522-1212
Office hours:
M-F 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Central Tim
or call his Washington Office:
202-225-4755
Office hours:
M-F 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Central Time
Tweet Keith Keith actively uses Twitter and frequently interacts with constituents who send him questions or comments at @KeithEllison. Many people have been talking about what a huge difference it would make in national discourse if Congressman Ellison were to run for the Democratic nomination for President in place of the tired and boring centrists like Sec.