Politics & Society
The Movement and the State
|
Bridging Two Forms of “We”.
Tikkun (https://www.tikkun.org/author/a_gabelp/)
How a trial can move social energy toward hope.
Supreme Court nominee Amy Barrett’s Misguided Judicial Philosophy.
Peter Gabel argues it is time to let go of the notion that the economy is something separate from us and instead see it is a manifestation of fear of the Other.
Peter Gabel helps us understand what we can learn today from the battle for the presidency between Bush and Gore in 2000.
Peter Gabel explains how fear of humiliation is at the root of racism.
Peter Gabel helps us understand why a social change movement must create and sustain a feeling of deep connection to each other and to the experience of being recognized by each other if it is to have any chance of success.
When Pompeo seeks genocidal action against Iran, what undermined his humanity?
Peter Gabel argues for an activism that breaks through the mutual distance that separates us and helps create a movement in which each of us becomes more fully recognized by “entering into each other’s presence.
Peter Gabel argues that Democrats must engage in a “positive and visionary communitarian politics” to compete with Trump’s imaginary MAGA community.
Peter Gabel argues that, in coopting songs from the 1960s, advertisers not only increase their profits but also strip the songs of their transcendental sense of meaning and purpose.
Peter Gabel argues that Trump supporters are not voting against their interest “but rather that their interests are different from what the critics think they are.”
Peter Gabel argues that the new socialism so popular among today’s emerging generation not only rejects capitalism as a system but rejects the idea of systems altogether.
In this review of “Cloudy Sundays,” Peter Gabel highlights the common ground between fascists and the indifferent majority: “a common flight from their true social being as grounded human persons seeking the love and affirmation of fellow humans.”
Peter Gabel on Brett Kavanaugh and the dangerous, collective hallucination of interpreting The Constitution using the “original intent” theory.